The Real Connection Between Obama and Ayers
May 4, 2009 by Guest Writer 2
Filed under General
The Real Connection between Obama and Ayers
Education in America continues to be a problem with America sinking lower in the world ranking. American children are being exposed to information without thought or feeling, just memorization and âfacts.â Fact is a word to be used lightly as we are seeing an indoctrination of American children to a world of make believe fashioned by mindsets who would like to erase history.
One of the main protagonists encouraging a make believe education is William Ayers. You may remember the name from this past Presidential election. He was Barack Obamaâs personal Achilles heel and somehow, he kept it covered from Parisâs arrow. William H. Ayers was the leader of the Weather Underground that violently protested the Vietnam War. He and members of his group bombed the Pentagon and other government buildings, two members died in the construction of homemade bombs.
Republicans attempted to correlate Ayers with Obama, placing Obama in Ayerâs influence during the inception of his Chicago political career. The claims rested on a coming out party given by Ayers for Obama in his house and involvement in community organizations. Sarah Palin and John McCain made constant reference to Ayers Weather Underground days, but they were barking up the wrong tree. If they had stayed away from the sensationalism and made the real connection apparent, parents across America may have had second thoughts about electing Barack Obama.
The real connection between Obama and Ayers rests in their involvement with the Chicago Annenburg Challenge (CAC) and the Chicago Principals & Administrators Association (CPAA). These organizations centered on education reform in Chicago. As Samantha Torrence on Digital Journal.com writes:
Not to beat a dead horse, but there is a connection between William Ayers and Barack Obama. Cry foul as one might, it is there and it is not based on bombing the Pentagon. It was based on education reform through CAC and CPAA where Obama and Ayers served on the same board promoting the same agenda. On the surface the agenda was more funding for public school systems, but while the one hand was promoting funding the other was slipping the indoctrination card from its sleeve.
The indoctrination of K-12 children in American schools across the nation is not far away; indeed it has already begun with the election of William Ayers as vice-president of the American Educational Research Association (AERA). His influence is now over hundreds of thousands of children in classrooms. His agenda is social advocacy, which would be fine if Americans did not know that his particular brand of social advocacy involves bombing the Pentagon.
Ayersâ agenda focuses on his role as vice-president of the AERA and has a major role in forming curriculum for American school teachers who are also indoctrinated by the AERA for proper teaching procedures. Children in America will now be taught what William Ayers and people of like minds would wish to teach to our children; the benefits of strong arming through populist anger, historical revisionism, and condemnation of Christianity. Indeed many school books are already full of these misrepresentation and lies in an attempt to âdumb downâ children. The question must be raised, if parents knew the full extent of Ayerâs manipulation of the education system, and that Barack Obama supported those views would they have voted for him? And how many licks does it take to get the tootsie role center of the tootsie pop? The world may never know.
A final thought for those unconcerned with who has access to their children’s minds.
Education is a weapon whose effects depend on who holds it in his hands and at whom it is aimed – Joseph Stalin
Obama’s Link to Saul Alinsky Explains Popularity
May 3, 2009 by Guest Writer 2
Filed under General
When one thinks of Community Organizers they immediately think of Obama and Acorn, but not many think of the father of modern Community Organizations in America. That man is Saul Alinsky, a very well educated man with a populist agenda whose teachings can be seen in all modern politics specifically that of the left. Saul Alinskyâs rules for radicals taught many in the baby boomer generation how to accomplish their societal desires. The Baby Boomer generation is the most unhappy generation in America despite the benefits gained through social equality and the guarantee of retirement funds from the social security administration. This generation is the catalyst of the denigration of America which came to climax in 2009 with the inauguration of President Barack Obama, a man who espouses all the ideas that Saul Alinsky taught to a generation of easily swayed, emotionally drugged up children
Barack Obamaâs very campaign operated on the Rules for Radicals and succeeded only because of the failing education and the increase in emotional response brought on by the pseudo intellectual left wing of America. He was vague, caused division, and appealed to the populous at the heart of a problem in America, the need to progress to something better. While some did not buy the words and looked past the feelings towards the fact, that was not enough to overcome the low level high school popularity contest into which the Presidential Election morphed.
“… the community organizer … must first rub raw the resentments of the people; fan the latent hostilities to the point of overt expression.’
– Saul Alinsky, Rules for Radicals
Causing anger and dissent amongst self proclaimed victims is one way that any leader following Alinskyâs rules can stoke the flames of popularity. He can claim that he is the only person who understands the victims; the only one could help the victims escape their turmoil. He gives them words of fancy that entrance them and light their hearts on fire with anger filled passion that seems almost righteous. The entrancing words are always vague and are always easy to impress upon the radical feelings stoked by the leader, in this case Barack Obama.
Barack Obamaâs message of Hope and Change, then Change We Can Believe In, was a line straight from Rules for Radicals.
Goals must be phrased in general terms like “Liberty, Equality, Fraternity,” “Of the Common Welfare,” “Pursuit of Happiness,” or “Bread and Peace.” — Saul Alinsky, Rules for Radicals
General terms are catch all phrases best used to catch the politically ignorant and unaware. They are great for stump speeches to hyped up crowds that hang on the drip of every venomous word. They call for hope but no substance. The Presidentâs report card for the first 100 days shows that people are now waking up to the fact that maybe Obama was a little more talk than action. It is important that if people are to understand President Obama, that they read the Rules for Radicals.
On a final note, Saul Alinskyâs book dedication went to one of the most successful organizers in history.
âLest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history… the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom â Lucifer.â
Obamanomics is not Fiscal Prudence
May 3, 2009 by Guest Writer 2
Filed under Economy, General
Prudence
NOUN:
1. The state, quality, or fact of being prudent.
2. Careful management; economy.
SYNONYMS:
prudence , discretion , foresight , forethought , circumspection
It makes sense that people balked openly at Barack Obamaâs latest statement about the economy when one looks at the above definition of prudence. Obama feels in his first hundred days of Presidency he exercised âfiscal prudence.â Many Americanâs beg to differ, if the recent protests indicate anything.
President Obama promised to decrease the deficit by half, which will not be difficult to do considering his current spending plan will increase it exponentially. Will he deliver on his promise? Sure, but it wonât even be half of the Bush Debt when he finally chips away at the spending. Yet I suppose we will be expected to be awed at how much he did do away with before is two terms are up and ignore the still massive debt. Remember to the Obama Administration, as per Press Secretary Gibbs, Millions of dollars is a big deal, but Billions is not such a big number.
The approved budget, accented by the stimulus plan, increases the already high national debt left by the Bush Administration. If we remember correctly the extremist liberals admonished Bushâs spending as well as that of Reagan, but Obama is taking both styles and running to the end zone with them. Bush increased spending on social programs more the Clinton, and Reagan introduced us to economic growth through debt. So when liberals complain take it with a grain of salt and maybe a worm. They are simply eternally miserable creatures that must have something to be upset about.
Well if liberals were all on board with helping the poor and middle class they will be howling about an announcement that came out of the IRS stating some of the stimulus money handed out to certain people will have to be given back. If that is not a wallet tease then what is? This may just be the opinion of one, but since when did what is termed âIndian Givingâ become Fiscal Prudence?
In the end all that Obamaâs plan attempts to do is to patch the economy now, but has no foresight and neither do many of the people who support them. The fact that Americans would make their great grandchildren shoulder the burden for their bad habits just makes the country look that much worse in the grand scheme of things.
Obama, Acorn, the Unions, and Mob Mentality all Tools for Communism
April 26, 2009 by Guest Writer 2
Filed under General
The news has been abuzz with criticisms of the mob mentality surrounding the peaceful Tax Day Tea Party protests; yet not long ago another mob was lightly praised in the Main Stream Media. The protests surrounding the AIG debacle were looked to with relative sympathy despite the death threats made to AIG executives and their families. Is it a sign of the times that populist mentality and mob mentality go hand in hand?
The mob surrounding the AIG executives went after their very own Frankensteinâs monster with pitchforks raised and ready to skewer what they saw as a danger to the common man. Every mob has a leader, the one who whispers from ear to ear stoking the fear and anger, but this mobâs leader was not a common man, but one above the populists. The leader was Barack Obama, by proxy the leader of the Democrats.
Obama has benefited by manipulation and the stoking of the mob mentality using his former association with ACORN. The Obama Administration first secured the bonuses for the AIG executives through language in bail out legislation. These bonuses were announced and an enraged public demanded action. While Timothy Geithner took the blunt of the tires as he was thrown under the bus, Obama in a move to either save face or reap the benefits of a calculated action, stormed over to meet with corporate executives. On his heels came the protests of a Union group, the Working Families Party, which was partly founded by ACORN.
During the meeting CEs reasoned with Obama saying that the bonuses were necessary to secure the best and the brightest in an international market. What came next shined a new and devious light on the situation. Rush Limbaugh and Politico then reported a rather disturbing statement from the very leader that gave AIG the bonuses for which they were now being attacked.
“Be careful. My administration is the only thing standing between you and the pitchforks,” said Obama.
The Democrats have notoriously been supported by Unions and Obama has been greatly involved in ACORN. The entire situation is an example of the deep manipulation done by the Obama administration through use of the mob. A mob that not only demands the hard earned money of others, but does so through the death of Capitalism as evidence by the signs at the AIG protests. âCapitalism is Organized Crime.â Ultimately the show of power set up AIG to fail so that the government could come in and gain control of a cornerstone of Wall Street.
The lesson here? The Obamassiah giveth and the Obamassiah taketh away.
Obamaisms
April 25, 2009 by Guest Writer 2
Filed under General
The last President of the United States gave Americans the gift of laughter on a weekly basis. Not one person in America is devoid of a favorite Bushism, whether real or parody. My favorites happen to be the parodies in the ads placed by Direct TV. My all time favorite is the invention of the word Decider. I like it, I use it. It is only fair that in these times of woe in America, that President Obama gives us quotes that make us laugh, cry, and burn with relative annoyance. Perhaps we should revisit them.
When a reporter asked Obama a foreign policy question while the then Presidential Candidate was visiting a diner in Pennsylvania, Obama responded, âWhy can’t I just eat my waffle?â These are the questions that haunt us! Why can a man not eat when he is hungry? When you gotta eat, you gotta eat!
In Beverton, Oregon we saw our dear Barack become mentally fatigued from a long campaign. To the astonishment of the nation he made a flub we thought was only possible by the group of people that pseudo-intellectuals on the left call âback water, in-bred, hicks.â To a large crowd at a campaign rally Obama confessed, âI have now been in 57 states â I think one left to go.â 57 States! Did America conquer more land than is currently apparent? Or are we just counting Canada and Europe into the fold?
And who can forget this little diddy? “On this Memorial Day, as our nation honors its unbroken line of fallen heroes — and I see many of them in the audience here today — our sense of patriotism is particularly strong.”
I see dead peopleâŠ
On the Tonight Show with Jay Leno, President Obama took a break from real work to participate in some more campaigning. Like all campaigning, it had a chance to take a turn for the worst and did! In a flippant remark meant to be humorous Obama compared his ineptitude in bowling to the performance of a peer at the Special Olympics. “No, no. I have been practicing…I bowled a 129. It’s like — it was like Special Olympics, or something.” Most of us heartless conservatives probably laughed at that joke, it is a common one. However a few of the more sensitive Americans had to pick their jaws off of the floor. It is a good thing a representative for the Special Olympics had a sense of humor. Apparently Obama sucks worse than the special bowlers who were said to be able to teach him a thing or two.
Of course these are just a taste of what is to come. Obama clearly will be full of delightful Obamaisms in the next four years. Let us just hope he isnât still making them in eight years.
